MEMORIES OF 2011 #3: Nine Types of Light Was Not Dear Science

3 years ago, TV On the Radio were the only band I listened to. Their gloriously messy sound and distinct New York scene feel made them a wonderfully unique band capable of making some truly beautiful music. After being introduced to the heavy Return to Cookie Mountain  at the tail-end of my College years, I already dug their sound, but when Dear Science dropped in late 2008, everything began to change. Dear Science was one of the best albums of the 2000s and an album I can honestly say is utterly timeless. It’s perfect in every way.

So after a long hiatus, news that the band were back making a new album left me in a fit of excitement as I had no idea just where they could go after their previous works. About a week or so after this news, “Will Do” was leaked onto the net and despite being a pretty great song, it left me with a sense of disappointment. It sounded like a song that would get nowhere near the final tracklisting of Dear Science, nor did it fuel my excitement for the next album. But then again, maybe it was a curveball like when LCD Soundsystem’s “Drunk Girls” was met with mass indifference and worry from the internet music community. Maybe the new album would be even more adventurous than the last 2 albums put together. If Talking Heads can be forgiven for True Stories* then the world can give Nine Types of Light a bye.

Well, Nine Types of Light wasn’t. It was an all too comfortable and easy album that lacked the immediacy and innovation of it’s predecessors. Don’t get me wrong; it wasn’t shit or anything, it just wasn’t what I was expecting or wanting. After a few listens, I left it to one side and forgot about it’s existence. In fact, the last time I listened to it was just after I found out Gerard Smith died of lung cancer, which was 9 days or so after the album was released.

I can’t honestly think of an album that underwhelmed me this badly in a while (maybe Girl Talk’s All Day which was also good, but couldn’t touch Feed the Animals), especially from a band who are pretty consistent with their works. Whilst I won’t say it’s a sign of the band’s downturn and plummet from greatness, I merely think it’s a misstep and that their future is still relatively bright. I’m sure their next album was be a true return to form with less of a sense of complacency and comfort to it.

They still have the prestigious honour of best Letterman performance EVER. 

*True Stories has a few good songs on it (People Like Us,Wild Wild Life) but when you compare it to everything that came before it, it’s the first true sign that the once great band were getting a little bit balls.

  1. Thanks “Mike”, your positive criticism means a lot to me. I’ll be sure to take what you say on board and write something that matches the high standards of the great “Mike”.

    It’s pretty simple; if you don’t like how or what I write, either you add another voice to the discussion and argue another case or you don’t read.

    • Mike said:

      Or you can stop “writing,” and find something better to do with your time since writing is something you’re clearly not very good at. Your choice.

      • Haha what? Like commenting on a rarely updated blog to a post nearly 12 months old. Mike, find something more productive to do with your time. Leave your house, potentially find a job and maybe (just maybe) you’ll not bother sharing your opinion (10 months later) on a blog run by someone who doesn’t give a fuck what you think.

        My writing’s amateurish but come on Mike, get a grip dude haha

    • Mike said:

      Nine Types of Light isn’t Dear Science probably because they’re two different albums. Ever thought about that? I hope you have a job because this writing thing isn’t working out.

      • I told myself I wasn’t going to reply to this but, fuck it, I have time whilst I watch the game on TV.

        The point behind this post (I think) was that I didn’t think the album was as good or as enjoyable as Dear Science. Then again, Dear Science wasn’t as good as Return to Cookie Mountain. That’s my personal preference. Sure, they’re two different albums but that doesn’t mean it’s virtually impossible to think one album is superior to the other in relation to a musician’s discography. The amount of music fans that rank artists and band’s back catalogues is pretty vast but you don’t go around telling them that (for example) Rust Never Sleeps can’t be compared or ranked above Harvest because they’re two different albums. That’s just ridiculous logic.

        Get off your high horse man, you haven’t got the right to tell me I can’t compare two albums. You’re just some guy on the internet who’s name is Mike.

        And one last thing. I don’t really care if “this writing thing isn’t working out”. This isn’t a job. This is something I choose to do in my spare time when I don’t have much else to do. I’ve never had any ambitions to go into writing. Surely you can tell that from this ‘regularly’ updated blog that I’m striving to get into music journalism!

        That all said, thanks for the comments. They gave me and a couple of my friends at work a bit of a laugh!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: